A recurring theme in philosophy is something like this: philosopher x proposes some properties that constitute concept C (more specifically I guess we'd say that the possession of said properties is individually necessary and jointly sufficient to constitute C). Ahh yes, but philosopher y has an example that shows that our intuitions about C go further; philosopher x's account leaves something important out!
This came to mind while watching an episode of The Twilight Zone this evening. The inmate's robot has all the qualities that (we think) a mental life comprises: rationality, learning abilities, emotions, qualitative conscious experiences like perception, pain and hunger. So does the robot have a mind? Well, perhaps some will disqualify the robot on account of lacking a soul. Regardless, if you feel the chill at the conclusion of the episode, ask yourself why.
Showing posts with label Videos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Videos. Show all posts
Sunday, September 11, 2011
Monday, July 25, 2011
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Thursday, June 09, 2011
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Philosophers debate abortion
Good luck finding another debate on abortion this clear, friendly and free of ideological murkiness.
Don Marquis and Michael Tooley (from Philosophy TV)
Saturday, April 09, 2011
Saturday, April 02, 2011
Eric Reitan lectures on his latest book
Monday, March 28, 2011
Friday, March 11, 2011
Monday, March 07, 2011
Random coolness
From an annual downhill bike race in Chile, known as the The Valparaiso Cerro Abajo Race. This helmet cam footage is amazing!
Sunday, March 06, 2011
Science and Religion Debate (Craig, Plantinga vs Gale, Smith)
Labels:
Alvin Plantinga,
Quentin Smith,
Religion,
Richard Gale,
Science,
Videos,
William Lane Craig
Monday, February 28, 2011
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Saturday, February 12, 2011
Sunday, February 06, 2011
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Friday, November 19, 2010
Debate Video: Does the Universe Have a Purpose?
It's probably an understatement to say that many people have been anxiously waiting to see William Lane Craig in a moderated debate with Richard Dawkins. After all, many of the objections to the arguments Dawkins presents in his recent books are philosophical objections. Well, this is probably about as good as it will get. I haven't watched yet, feel free to post thoughts if you do.
Richard Dawkins, Michael Shermer, and Matt Ridley v.s.William Lane Craig, Douglas Geivett, and Rabbi David Wolpe
Richard Dawkins, Michael Shermer, and Matt Ridley v.s.William Lane Craig, Douglas Geivett, and Rabbi David Wolpe
Sunday, November 14, 2010
A pastoral perspective on wise communication
I think this relates nicely to my ongoing series of blog posts on blogging and public discourse.